Cyberdevil 2021-05-06 05:13:26

Woo, first impressions I love it, refreshingly real, second thought you might be missing the good parts if it's all from this angle..reading the comment on interactive versions hmm... this sounds promising.

Looking forward to seeing it for real.

Cyberdevil 2021-05-06 09:36:10

Ah I'm not sure what the ideal ones would be, but usually more frontside than backside feels more aesthetically appealing to me. Everything's just a little veiled in back. Not just the body, but expressions too, which always seem like a food amplifier of pleasure/playfulness/whatever sensations are a going on there.

Are they still in Flash? It might not be impossible to have those here too though, Ruffle supports at least AS2 pretty well, and there is the NG Player too, though requires a bit more effort for users to get that working. Have you tested those submissions here too though recently? Do you package them as a standalone .exe now?

Though I understand if you'd want to have them as a perk for Patrons only either way, seems like pretty good incentive to join up.

Cyberdevil 2021-05-06 09:42:15

*GOOD amplifier, lmao XD

Regarding the angles btw, was thinking it seems the most common ones are usually head on, either front or back, feels like ones that are slightly from the side always come across richer somehow, everything's more dimensional but also just... richer somehow. Maybe that's just me though. Maybe it's just the more difficult angles feel like the more thorough ones. Maybe it's refreshing with less used vantage points too. :)

Cyberdevil 2021-05-06 12:37:50

Well it'll be interesting to see how those expressions evolve. :) Probably hard to master.

Regarding Flash, the videos you upload now were made with Flash too then? yeah when you export your file you can select to export as a standalone .exe, though I'm not sure if Windows/Adobe are trying to block these too... hopefully not. A while ago at least it seemed to be the one way you could keep playing them. Even if you download the .swf file it won't work without workarounds now, an older player or modified configuration file (that was the latest edit with the NG Player - seems to still work with Windows 7 but not 10 currently) for example. With Ruffle however it should be possible to play regardless, though it doesn't support AS3 yet, thus my question regarding that?

Ah that's good to know. Hope we might be seeing some of those again here some day then, when it's all working like it's supposed to...

Cyberdevil 2021-05-06 13:27:32

Ah that's how it works! Would've thought there was an interlace included too, is that just outside the frame then? Or if it is there it's subtle, I don't recall it...

Aha, that's a bummer, hope Ruffle improves quick enough and starts supporting that too then, quick way to get it all working online too then. :)

Cyberdevil 2021-05-06 15:16:41

Nice! Gotta appreciate the elaborate process behind that too, all for a quality viewing experience. :)

Cyberdevil 2021-05-06 15:17:14

No worries about the English! It's not bad at all. though I'm not a native either so maybe not the right person to say so. ;)